Summer 2010 Research with Janet Davis:
Participatory Design of Persuasive Technology
This document provides an overview of my projects with students in summer 2010 and my expectations of those students.
Research areas
My main research area is human-computer interaction. My recent work is concerned with the application of participatory design methods to the area of persuasive technology.
Persuasive technology systems are intended to change behaviors and attitudes. For
example, the Google PowerMeter service is intended to provide
households with feedback on their electricity consumption, so they can
take steps to reduce it. As another example, the Nintendo WiiFit
Plus game not only provides feedback on the user's weight, balance, and
mental acuity, but also encourages the user to set fitness goals,
teaches users how to do exercises, makes it easy to do a set routine,
and praises the user for playing regularly and for performing well.
Although the examples I've given are commercial
systems, persuasive technology is an active research area with
roots in both interaction design and behavioral psychology.
The
novelty of my work is in the adaptation of participatory design methods
to designing persuasive technology. Participatory design is different
from other interaction design methods in that it casts end users and
other stakeholders in the role of full partners in the design process.
Such participation may take the form of workshops, games, storytelling,
roleplaying, discussions, building low-tech mock-ups, and revising
prototype systems. Because it involves users in key decisions
throughout the design process, I believe that participatory design will
be a valuable approach for ensuring that new persuasive technology
respects the user's welfare and autonomy: that is, that the technology
will help users change their behavior in ways that are good for them
and that they want for themselves.
Before applying, you should read the following abstracts, which discuss my prior work in this area.
You
must have be a rising junior or senior and have taken CSC 161
to apply. Desirable but not required are experience with
object-oriented design (CSC 1207), software
design (CSC 323/325), visual design (e.g., art), or work with human
subjects (e.g., psychology or anthropology). Other desirable experience
is noted in the project descriptions below.
The projects
I
am considering three projects for this summer. I intend to work with a
total of four MAP students, who will work in pairs on two of these
three projects.
- The Firefly Stairway, an interactive
sculpture intended to encourage people to take the stairs rather than
the elevator, was designed by students Tim Miller and Pat Rich as part
of their MAP project on participatory design of ambient persuasive
technology in summer 2008. Though they built and installed a prototype
system, it was too fragile to implement many of the proposed features
or to conduct a conclusive evaluation study. In this project, you
would re-envision and re-construct the Firefly Stairway. You will
design and implement
a robust system architecture, allowing the
system to remain running for several weeks at a time. The system
architecture should also be flexible enough to let you implement
several different patterns of human interaction with the
sculpture. The system should be designed to collect data on its
own use, and you may also help to design an evaluation study to be
carried out during the fall semester.
You will help to choose a sensor/actuator platform, such as Phidgets or Arduino, and become proficient in its use. In
addition to the coursework listed above, this project will benefit from
experience with concurrent programming (CSC 213), embedded computing
(CSC 211), and/or electronics.
My current work with
EcoHouse has led to the idea of a social networking web site just for
college and university eco-houses and eco-dorms. This site would
motivate users and help them to learn from each other and collaborate
on projects. You will interact with participants to identify and
experiment with potential persuasive features, design
and implement promising features, and help plan for more formal
evaluation.Because users will come from all over, and even Grinnell EcoHousers may
be away for the summer, participation will be through email or through the web
site itself. You will conduct background research on distributed
participatory design and persuasive social networks---both exciting new
subareas for me---and reflect on the relationship between these areas.
Implementation of the web site will most likely be in Drupal,
a content management system which has been used for many social network
sites and also for Grinnell College's new web site. Ideally, you will
have taken CSC 325 or have other significant experience with web site
design.
- The final project idea is to extend the
participatory design work to a new audience or behavior that we choose
together. For example, the design process might continue to focus on
Grinnell College students as audience and participants, but target
stress relief rather than environmental sustainability. Or we might
continue working on environmental sustainability, but shift the
audience to local families. Building on my experience with
applying participatory design methods to persuasive technology, you
will plan the design process, write an IRB proposal, recruit
participants, facilitate participatory design activities, develop
prototype or proof-of-concept systems, and reflect on the overall
process.
This project is closest to the heart of my research, but
probably the furthest from the formal computer science curriculum.
However, note that the direction is very similar to where I started my
work with Tim Miller and Pat Rich in 2008, and that project was quite
successful. Your interests and activities outside computer science may
help us to choose a direction and establish relationships with
participants and domain experts.
Approximate schedule
Much of this schedule follows the official divisional schedule for
summer research. I will certainly understand if a student accepts a
position with me and later chooses to take a more attractive position
elsewhere. In that case, I will notify students on my waiting list.
- Friday, Feb. 26: Application forms due. You must submit the
science division form online and your responses to my application form via email to me.
- Friday, Mar. 12: Initial selections announced.
- Friday, Mar. 19: Deadline for accepting or rejecting the offer.
- Week of Apr. 5: First meeting.
- Additional spring meetings.
- Monday, May 5: Part A of MAP applications due.
- Monday, May 19: Commencement.
- Tuesday, June 1: Part B of MAP applications due.
- Monday, June 14 (tentative): Summer research begins.
- Friday, August 20 (tentative): Summer research concludes.
Expectations
I have high expectations of my summer
research students. I will expect my summer students to begin their work
in the spring and continue it into the fall (and perhaps beyond). By
applying for summer research you are agreeing to meet these
expectations. You are unlikely to receive explicit credit or
compensation for work in the spring and fall (with one exception discussed below).
Students will work in teams of two. We will meet most days during the summer and several times before the summer begins.
Spring
- Topic preparation
- You will be expected to begin
your background research during the
spring. In particular, you must review papers I have cited and
identify at least four additional papers on
related projects. Sources to consider include the ACM Digial Library
(particularly proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference),
proceedings of the Pervasive Computing conference, and proceedings of
the Participatory Design Conference. You are
also encouraged to use the Web and, once you've identified potentially
useful resources, to consult with the librarians about using Science
Citations.
- Skill preparation
- If your project will require a programming language,
data language, toolkit, or application that you do not yet know, you are expected to begin
studying it. You need not master it, but should begin to develop some
familiarity.
Summer
During the summer, you are expected to work full time on the project:
40-50 hours per week for ten weeks. This work will include scheduled
daily group meetings and collaborative work time (e.g., pair
programming or team design sessions). Working with stakeholders may
require occasional evening or weekend work, depending on their availability. In short, your schedule will be flexible, but not
arbitrarily so.
- Topic preparation
- For the first week or so of summer research, you will continue your
preparation from the spring, developing a survey of "the state of the
art" in whatever project you've decided to undertake. You should
prepare a short survey paper. On the first day of the second week,
you'll give a public presentation of your work.
- Core research
- For the next eight weeks of the summer, you will work on your
project, using what you've learned during preparation for guidance.
Some of this time may be spent continuing to develop skills and investigating further literature as needed.
- Writing
- For the last week of the summer (and, preferably, as you do your
work), you will write a five-to-ten page paper describing your
work and placing it in the context of related work. Your paper should
meet the highest standards of writing at Grinnell. Students working as
part of a group need prepare only one paper. You may be
required to submit a version of this paper to a conference or journal.
(I may provide significant assistance in developing
the submitted version, in which case I will be listed as a co-author.)
Fall and Beyond
- Poster presentation
- You will create a poster describing your work and present it at
the Grinnell Science Poster Seminar (typically during Parents' Weekend).
- Internal public presentation
- You will give a 25- to 50-minute presentation on your work as part of the Thursday Extras colloquium series.
- External student presentation
- You must submit your
work to the Midstates Science and Mathematics Consortium
Fall Symposium on Undergraduate Research in the Physical and
Mathematical Sciences. You must attend the symposium (including
non-cs talks) and present your work (in poster or talk form) if
your work is accepted. I will join you if I am able.
- External conference presentation
- If your work is submitted to and accepted by another conference, and
there is funding available for you to attend, you will be expected to
attend and present your work.
- Evaluation studies
- If
your project involves evaluation of a system designed and implemented
during the summer, and this evaluation cannot take place during
the summer (e.g., because it will require students' presence on
campus), then I may encourage you to register for an additional 2
credit MAP for the fall semester. You will be expected to help plan the
study during the summer, carry out data collection in the fall,
contribute to data analysis, and report on the study method and
findings.
Janet Davis (davisjan@cs.grinnell.edu)
Created February 3, 2010
Last modified February 5, 2010
With thanks to Sam Rebelsky: http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Department/samr-summer-2007.html