TEC154 2010S, Class 02: What is Technology? Overview: * Defining "Technology", Revisited * Weinberg: Can Technology Replace Social Engineering? * Berry: Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer. * Florman: Technology and the Tragic View. Admin: * I plan to take attendance today, just so I can start to learn your names. * It will take a LONG time. Sorry. * We'll experiment with this "lecture style" orientation today. * EC for ... * Attending Thursday's Gene Gaub concert, 11 am Herrick. [Academic] * Attending Friday's conclusion to support Haiti week. [Misc.] * ... * I have not had a chance to go over all of your responses to assignment 1. I will try by Friday. Make sure that you did both main parts (one about the class, one about you). * I did see some comments to the effect that "I have trouble responding to questions on the fly." If I ask you a question, you should feel free to say "Give me a minute to compose an answer." You may also talk to me outside of class to help figure out ways for you to more easily contribute. * I also saw a question about a comment on programming assignments. That's part of the "The Course Web will undergo revisions." I cut and pasted a lot of the site from elsewhere. * Most of the reading questions were, in essence, discussion questions. That's fine, but I was expecting more clarification questions. * We'll take a fairly basic approach to today's readings. (This IS a 100-level course.) * Readings for Friday: Marx [9th/1; 11th/1] Pool [9th/2; 11th/2] Winner [9th/14; 11th/6]. Technology: Defining the Term * Berry listed what *good* technology is, but may not have defined the term. * And really seems to think about technology as "tools" * Weinberg says that technology is a means to solving social problems. * A potential of technology, not really a definition. * Florman talks about the *process* of technological innovation. "I was impressed by this pattern of progress/setback/renewed creative effort." * "Technology" - "I may not bother to define it, but everyone knows what I mean." Weinberg: * Thesis/Primary Claim: * Technology can replace social engineering ... to some extent * Technology is more effective than social engineering to alleviate social problems, at least in the short run. * While technology may not be able to replace social engineering, it provides a tool for the social engineer, at least for short-term solutions. * Implied: Social engineers try to solve social problems * Question: Can social engineers use technology? * Yes, they certainly use existing technologies, like TV * But do they use innovative technologies, which seems to be part of Weinberg's claim * Okay we have a dichotomy of opinion about the primary claim * To some: Technology is a better solution to social problems than policy * To others: Technology works along with policy to solve problems * To others: Technology is a bandage that buys us time to solve the problems in other ways * Where do we see the primary claim? p. 29 of 9th edition "Technology will never replace social engineering. But technology ..." * Additional claims: * It is difficult to assess when a problem is solved. * Back to question of new technologies vs. existing technologies of tools of the social engineer * Lots of focus on nuclear technology. Is it new or old? * Perhaps adaptation of existing technologies. How does Weinberg serve as a lense for assessing technologies? * Perhaps he doesn't. It certainly isn't a good/bad assessment. * It is a question about potential. * Can this technology help me solve some social problems, even if that was not it's original intent? * Or can I at least make a claim that it solves social problems? Berry * "I'm not going to buy a computer because it leads to negative things and social ills." * Technology can be immoral. Lenses: * His list of ten or so criteria for a new technology * Although it may be impossible to meet all of those criteria * Consider the indirect effects of technology, as well as the direct effects