Eigenvectors B1, B2, ..., BN are linearly independent and form a basis for RN. Thus, any vector V can be writen as a linear combination:
Then
| AV | = A(b1 B1 + b2 B2 + ... + bN BN) |
| = b1 A B1 + b2 A B2 + ... + bNA BN | |
| = b1 &lambda1 B1 + b2 &lambda2 B2 + ... + bN &lambdaN BN |
Similarly,
Ak V=
b1 &lambda1k B1 +
b2 &lambda2k B2 + ... +
bN &lambdaNk BN
Dividing by &lambda1k gives:
(1/&lambda1k) Ak V=
b1 B1 +
b2 (&lambda2k
/&lambda1k) B2 + ... +
bN (&lambdaNk
/&lambda1k )BN
Since &lambda1 is the largest eigenvalue, the expressions (&lambdajk /&lambda1k) converge to 0 as k increases.
Thus, if we start with any vector V that is not in the subspace spanned by the eigenvectors B2 through BN, then (1/λ1k)Ak V converges to an eigenvector B1.
Without [just a little] more analysis, we do not know &lambda1. Instead, we scale the result of each successive power Ak V, to make it a unit vector. With just modest assumptions on the nature of the eigenvalues, such a process of taking powers should converge to a principal eigenvector for the dominent eigenvalue &lambda1
|
created: 10 February 2007 last revised: 15 February 2007 | previous next |
|